Blog

Key Takeaways A non-infringement opinion is a written legal analysis from a patent attorney concluding whether a specific product does or does not infringe a specific patent. It comes up in two scenarios: defensively, after receiving a cease-and-desist letter, or offensively, when a patent holder wants to confirm a case exists before asserting its patent against a competitor. It differs from a freedom-to-operate search in timing: an FTO search is preventive and happens during

Key Takeaways A freedom to operate (FTO) search checks whether launching your product could infringe someone else's existing patents. It does not check whether your own idea is patentable; that's a separate patentability search. FTO searches are jurisdiction-specific. Clearing the U.S. says nothing about your risk in the EU or elsewhere. Timing is everything. The right window is once the product has real shape (you know what it does and how it's built) but before major R&D, m

A Spirit of Dialogue in Action At Davos 2026, conversations about responsible leadership and global cooperation aren’t just happening on center stage—they’re being shaped in spaces like the WIN Lounge, a global platform hosted by the Women Inspiring Network. This year, I’m honored to be invited to speak at the WIN Lounge on “Future of Capital: Funding inclusive innovation and purpose-led ventures,” on January 22, at the WIN Lounge. The invitation is personal, but the purpose

In today’s evolving landscape of governance, innovation, and inclusive leadership, I’m exploring how public-private dialogue can help shape policies that foster innovation, strengthen collaboration, and support an inclusive AI-powered future. Innovation doesn’t happen in isolation. It emerges from friction, feedback, and collaboration. The most enduring innovation ecosystems—from Silicon Valley to Shenzhen—are built not just on capital and talent, but on a continuous dialogue